Monday, March 3, 2008

The Colvin Report: Farrakahn Connection Part II


Perhaps HRC was being a bit aggressive asking Obama to denounce and reject Farrakhan, but I'd like to share some direct quotes from Farrakahn that show what he thinks about America and basically anyone who is not a Muslim or Black.

Recall, just a few months ago Obama's church, led by Obama's spiritual adviser who precided over Obama and Michelle's wedding, gave Farrakhan a lifetime achievement award.

If Obama's church is not Muslim (which they are not) then what exactly are they awarding him for?

Here we go:

Jews are "bloodsuckers," and Judaism is a "gutter religion."

"The white man" is the "anti-Christ."

White people are "potential humans … they haven't evolved yet."

He's also called whites "vicious beasts" and "the skunks of the planet."

"A decree of death has been passed on America. The judgment of God has been rendered and she must be destroyed."

"There is no wicked nation in the past that approaches the evil that is practiced in America on a daily basis."

"It is an act of mercy to white people that we end your world. … We must end your world and bring in a new world."

What does Obama's spiritual adviser, Rev. Wright of the Chicago United Trinity Church have to say:

“When Minister Farrakhan speaks, black America listens. His depth on analysis [sic] when it comes to the racial ills of this nation is astounding and eye-opening. He brings a perspective that is helpful and honest.”

Hailing Farrakhan’s “integrity and honesty,” Rev. Wright said, “His love for Africa and African-American people has made him an unforgettable force, a catalyst for change, and a religious leader who is sincere about his faith and his purpose.”

I certainly do not believe "black America listens" when Farrakhan speaks, but I am surprised that a Reverend of a Christian church would hold such feelings.

So, what is wrong with requesting a rejection? Why didn't Obama do it earlier? And Why is Obama a part of a church that follows these values?

8 comments:

J. Randall Cooper said...

i'm more than sure that you wouldnt have to look deep in either john mccain's or mike huckabee's or hillary clinton's past to draw some connection to some former or even current klansman who once or even still does say equally disgustingly racists things.

and i, for one, can denounce what it is that obama's "spirtual advisers" (as you put it) said. when farrakhan talks this black American does not listen.

there's no need to make (or report)sweepingly broad statements that suggests that black America clings to every word that farrakhan says. that is certainly not true.

many of us, most of us, could give a damn what farrakhan says or thinks. and that could very easily include obama.

none of our "spiritual adviser's" world views necessarily reflect our own. and to say so is to be ridiculous.

Derek Colvin said...

I dont mean to suggest that such ignorant comments are suggestive of most people at all, I certainly hope that it is not.

However, I do believe it is reflective of Obama's church and the people he surrounds himself with.

If McCain were a member of a church that supported the Klan I would most certainly want to know.

3 Months ago Obama was boasting his strong ties with his church, he made the bed, he should sleep in it.

My point is to highlight the relevance of distancing himself from Farrakhan. And questioning why his church is so openly admiring of this man.

J. Randall Cooper said...

i thought he did distance himself.

and do we know that McCain is not a member of a church that supports the klan?

Derek Colvin said...

He didn't begin to distance himself until it became a problem.

Obama and his wife have been members of this church for a long time, he admits his Rev. is a bit controversial from the pulpit. Why not go to a christian church in Chicago that doesn't support a Muslim leader who continually denounces America.

I am fairly sure that if McCain had these ties, and his church had given a Lifetime Achievement Award to a klansman it would be well known, and rightly so. (or any other significant ties)

The media has looked into his background since his 2000 presidential run and on a smaller scale for the 20 previous years.

Do you not think it is unusual that Obama has so many questionable ties?

His strongest point is that he didnt support the war in Iraq... but he wasn't a Senator then, he admited that he didnt know what he would do if i had the intelligence.

Derek Colvin said...

I personally think he needs to speak out more against his church or at least explain to America why he chose a church that is so controversial.

Derek Colvin said...

Again AVT... I ask you why Obama and his wife picked a church who shares values with Farrakhan? How can you say he has nothing to do with him... his church honered him.

You are telling me a US Senator and longtime friend of Rev. Wright has no pull in his church... come on.

He associates himself with a church that lives by a "black value system," black commandments, and consideres Farrakhan a great man.

I am giving him the benefit of the doubt and saying it is a christian church while many others believe it is just a Cult.

Travis Hunter said...

I agree with one point here. You can't choose who supports you. However, you can be quick to denounce them, which Obama has not been. It seems suprising to me that many in Obama's church have not been more critical of Farrakhan. Although associatation with a group does not automatically mean a person holds the same value as the group, the company a man keeps does say a great deal about his character. Mr. Obama did the right thing by denouncing the hateful statements, but perhaps he needs to do more to show that he truely believes America can become a place devoid of hate and discrimination. I look forward to seeing how Obama handles these challenges if he decides to finally address them.

Derek Colvin said...

If you would read my posts I have stated numerous reasons why I do not trust Obama and why I do not think he has legitimate plans.

Its not smear when its true.