Thursday, March 20, 2008

Why did Obama Stay?

A quick response to my colleague concerning Obama's reticence to leave his church. I mentioned Hagee and Wright in the last post to prove a larger point, but I don't intend to conflate the two. Obama had his conversion experience at Wright's church, so that's much more significant a relationship that McCain's is with Hagee. Obama's been going to Trinity for his entire life in Chicago. My only point was organized religion has a very strong tendency toward hypocrisy, and I'm very wary of that fact. So, I digress. I'm much more interested in talking about Obama's foreign policy speech today (and McCain's bungling of Iraq 101...). We'll save that for the next post. Back to the matter at hand...


I believe he stayed for two reasons, both equally strong, one pragmatic (although you might find it opportunistic), and the other completely honest and whole-hearted. While I think this is a mark on Obama's record, I assert the basic calculus on Obama has not changed. He is the same man I expected him to be, and the same candidate that I believe is best suited to lead this country.

First, Obama is a religious man, a Christian who had a religious rebirth at Holy Trinity. As many of you know, this can be a powerful force. I don't see a reason to doubt this occurred, and he's spoken and written about this transformative experience. This bound him in some ways to Rev. Wight, for better or worse. I think he should have dropped him like a bad habit years ago because I find him repulsively unpatriotic. But, I also believe in Obama's honest religiosity, just as I believe in President Bush's. If you confirm you are born-again, that you have had a spiritual experience, this can be enough to keep you coming to a Church whose pastor you don't happen to agree with, if only because you see good things happening ("God's work"). It's not easy to drop someone to whom you owe your spiritual life. Conversely, it's very easy, in the abstract, to call for Obama to drop this moron and to ignore the truth that the Church may have given something to Obama beyond the mere sermons.

Even providing the above, I can agree that it simply doesn't excuse (in the political world) Obama's continued attendance. The second reason I believe Obama stuck around was simply because he was a Chicago politician from "the neighborhood". The Church is the most powerful outlet for community involvement. Call me cynical, and call Obama the same, but do realize the relationship with and reputation in his community Obama earned by attending and interacting with his neighbors and friends. Obama is, above all, a morally courageous politician (and more so than Senator Clinton, or Gov. Romney, for example, by an immeasurable amount), but he is not perfect. I do not pretend that he is, although many do. It would have been an enormous and, probably, politically deadly choice to walk away from church years ago. He would not be where he is today without the community's support in his earliest days in Chicago as a local organizer. As they came to owe him, he came to owe them. No man is an island, they say.

If this is the worst of his political expediency, then so be it. There are few reasons to believe that he makes a habit of such acts. On countless other measures, he has been apt to say and do the impolitic. By nature, he is an unlikely candidate for office, with a foreign-sounding name and an unusual journey. If anyone would need to use expediency often to cover his glaring "flaws", conventional wisdom would say it would be a guy named Barack Hussien Obama. Yet, he has most often refused to take that route. I needn't recount the numerous examples of this but only to say this:

That if I were to bet on the sanctity and sincerity of just one candidate's character, intelligence, judgment and demeanor, it would be Barack Obama's. In all that has been written, by Senator Obama himself and by others, in all that I have observed and heard, I cannot conclude otherwise. My trust, however, is not important, and I know it will convince very few. I only hope that in this coming election, after all (and I mean all) is said and done, the American people will find what I have found and elect Senator Obama to be our next President. Stay tuned.

2 comments:

Derek Colvin said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Derek Colvin said...

I agree with your reasoning, moreso the second point, however thats not what Obama said. If he had come out and said that, which i believe is the likely case, i would be less skeptic. The first point, maybe to some extent, but I do not still go to the same church as I was baptized nor do my parents or their parents (and for lesser reasons then Wright has given Obama).

As that bleep in the beginning, I wish Obama well on trying to prove he knows more about foreign policy. That is not where he wants this debate going. Americans trust McCain on that. Just as Obama said Al-Quada was not in Iraq and he would go in if they were, McCain had a slip up.

Although you may see more about Obama's "judgment" as he was against iraq, then supported Kerry voting for it, saying he did not know what he would have done with the info they had, then he voted 85 of 86 times the same way Hillary did on iraq issues.

In 2003, he said he was wrong about his decision, because the war was working. Heck, in 2004 he even said that his views were "about the same" as George W. It wasn't until things stretched out that Obama went back to his original proposition where he was a mere Chicago Senator with no access to intelligence.

Obama also said that there was no way a surge would work.... but that has shown to not be true.

You get my point?